Simplified Explanation of the Judgment
This case arose from a contractual dispute between the State of Bihar and a private construction company. The contract was executed under the Road Construction Department, Gopalganj. A sole arbitrator, appointed by the Patna High Court, delivered an arbitral award in favour of the company on 4 June 2005.
Background
Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the correct legal remedy to challenge an arbitral award is to file an application under Section 34 before the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction, which in most cases is the District Judge. Instead of doing so, the State of Bihar filed a Title Suit before the Sub Judge, Gopalganj, seeking a declaration that the arbitral award was void.
The construction company contested this move, stating that the Sub Judge had no jurisdiction to hear such matters. On 15 April 2015, the Sub Judge dismissed the suit, citing lack of jurisdiction and also rejecting the claim on merits.
The State then filed an appeal against this dismissal. During the appeal, the State sought to change the case title into a Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration Act. However, the High Court noted that the State’s initial filing itself was fundamentally flawed, and the procedural error could not be rectified by simply changing the title midway.
Court’s Observations
- The only proper legal remedy against an arbitral award is a Section 34 petition before the District Judge, not a civil suit before a Sub Judge.
- The State had earlier (in 2012) filed an application to convert the suit into a Section 34 petition, but it was rejected in 2013, and the State never challenged that rejection.
- The Court relied on its earlier decision in Shivam Housing Pvt. Ltd. v. Thakur Mithilesh Kumar Singh (2015) 3 PLJR 876, which confirmed that only the District Judge can hear Section 34 petitions.
- Supreme Court precedents — State of West Bengal v. Associated Contractors (2015) 1 SCC 32 and State of Jharkhand v. Hindustan Construction Co. (2018) 2 SCC 602 — also supported this interpretation.
Decision
The High Court dismissed the State’s appeal, holding that the procedural defect from the outset was incurable. The Court ordered the lower court records to be returned.
Significance or Implication of the Judgment
- Reaffirms that arbitral awards can only be challenged through the specific statutory procedure under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
- Clarifies that the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction (generally the District Judge) has exclusive jurisdiction in such matters.
- Serves as a caution to government departments and litigants about the consequences of adopting the wrong legal remedy — procedural mistakes can be fatal, regardless of the merits of the case.
Legal Issue(s) Decided and the Court’s Reasoning
- Whether a civil suit before a Sub Judge is maintainable to challenge an arbitral award.
✘ No. The Arbitration Act provides only for a Section 34 petition before the District Judge. - Whether the procedural defect could be cured by converting the matter into a miscellaneous appeal under Section 37.
✘ No. The original defect and failure to challenge the 2013 rejection order were fatal.
Judgments Relied Upon or Cited by Court
- State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Associated Contractors, (2015) 1 SCC 32
- State of Jharkhand & Ors. v. Hindustan Construction Co., (2018) 2 SCC 602
- Shivam Housing Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Thakur Mithilesh Kumar Singh & Anr., 2015 (3) PLJR 876
Case Title
State of Bihar v. M/s Bhaibhaw Construction Pvt. Ltd.
Case Number
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 272 of 2015
Citation(s)
2020 (3) PLJR 278
Coram and Names of Judges
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava
Names of Advocates and who they appeared for
For the Appellant (State): Mr. Binod Kumar, AC to GP-10
For the Respondent (Company): Mr. Nand Kishore Singh, Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocates
Link to Judgment
https://patnahighcourt.gov.in/viewjudgment/MiMyNzIjMjAxNSMxI04=-k1pY49HgYSM=
If you found this explanation helpful and wish to stay informed about how legal developments may affect your rights in Bihar, you may consider following Samvida Law Associates for more updates.
