Introduction:
This case, heard in the High Court of Judicature at Patna, concerns a challenge to a notice issued under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956. The petitioner, Md. Muzaffar Alam, contested the notice, which directed him to remove an encroachment from a piece of land. The court examined the petitioner's claims and the validity of the notice.
Background:
The case involves a notice issued by the Circle Officer, Rafiganj, Aurangabad, under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956. The notice directed the petitioner to remove an encroachment from land pertaining to certain property records.
Petitioner's Claims:
The petitioner, Md. Muzaffar Alam, sought the following reliefs:
To quash the encroachment notice.
To direct the authorities to conduct a proper land measurement in his presence.
To allow him to engage a private surveyor during the land measurement.
To put previous measurements done in his absence on hold until a fresh measurement could be conducted.
High Court's Decision:
The Patna High Court, presided over by Justice P. B. Bajanthri and Justice Alok Kumar Pandey, made the following observations and decisions:
Validity of the Show Cause Notice: The court held that it does not have the jurisdiction to interfere with a show-cause notice unless the notice was issued by an authority lacking the competence to do so, or if it violates any statutory rules. The petitioner did not provide evidence to support either of these grounds.
Premature Petition: The court considered the petition premature, as the petitioner had the opportunity to respond to the show-cause notice.
Disposal of the Writ Petition: The court disposed of the petition, instructing the petitioner to submit a detailed explanation to the show-cause notice within 15 days. The concerned authority was directed to make a decision and communicate it to the petitioner within two months of receiving the explanation.
Interim Order: The court clarified that any interim order previously in effect was terminated with the final order.
Illegal Encroachments: The court also referenced a recent Supreme Court decision regarding illegal encroachments, emphasizing factors to be considered when dealing with such situations, including whether the petitioner is the owner of the property, whether the land is encumbered, whether the petitioner is an unauthorized occupant, whether building plans were sanctioned, and the legality of the construction. The authority concerned was directed to consider these factors while finalizing the matter.
Read the full judgement Below;
0 Comments